To say the Cleveland Browns have taken their fans on a roller coaster ride of emotions through the first seven weeks of the NFL season would be a gross understatement.
From Josh Gordon's drug suspension to Brandon Weeden's thumb injury to the trade of Trent Richardson to the emergence of Brian Hoyer and back, Browns fans have went from burying their team to praising it to burying it all over again ... and we're not even in November yet and they still haven't even played the hated Pittsburgh Steelers once.
it's hard to believe that, just two weeks ago, the Browns had first place in the AFC North all to themselves after a thrilling 37-24 home win over the Buffalo Bills on a nationally televised Thursday night. They were 3-2 overall. The defense was outstanding and the offense was starting to find itself.
Two weeks later, you hear fans talking of "tanking" the season to draft a quarterback prospect after back-to-back blowout defeats at the hands of the Detroit Lions at home and the Green Bay Packers on the road. Keep in mind the Browns are still only 3-4, still tied for second in the AFC North and still, technically, in contention for a playoff berth.
Through seven games, this longtime Browns fan and observer can identify at least five players that have underwhelmed with their individual performances and are on the fast track of being replaced next season, if not sooner. Yes, one of those five is the suspect everyone expects, so we'll save him for last.
1. Greg Little, WR -- Why does it seem that, in the expansion era of the Cleveland Browns, whoever is in charge always seems to draft wide receivers that are inconsistent in the one area an NFL wide receiver needs to be consistent in, which is catching the football? From Braylon Edwards to Quincy Morgan to Andre Davis to Dennis Northcutt to Travis Wilson, the Browns have specialized in drafting receivers who couldn't catch a cold if they were stranded naked in Siberia, let alone catch a football on a consistent basis. Some were worse than others. We can safely add Greg Little's name to that list, although it's been on that list ever since he joined this team as a second-rounder in 2011. Little's drops have been highlighted this season because the team was without No. 1 deep threat Josh Gordon for the first two weeks, which meant he was expected to be the Browns' top wideout. Instead, his inconsistencies were on display with no one else to shield him. And, while hands would be an issue alone, he's also had issues with running the right routes, talking to the media and even off-the-field issues concerning traffic violations. After a particularly bad game at Baltimore in Week 2, Little was stopped down in the Flats section of Cleveland after running a stop sign and cited for that, driving under suspension and change of course. He had just $472 in fines the week before after he was caught with an expired license plate and driving 81 in a 60. He's been demoted to kickoff returner, and he even lost his gig doing that after some ill-advised returns out of the end zone during the nationally-televised win over Buffalo. His miserable day Sunday was exacerbated by a drop in the end zone on a slant on fourth down on the Browns' final offensive play of the game. They've shopped him this season, but with no takers, Little may have to play out the string knowing that this is his last chance to make a good impression on a group of gentlemen who not only did not draft him, but may not have even wanted to draft him had they been in charge in 2011.
2. Buster Skrine, CB -- Many Browns fans wanted to see Buster Skrine replaced as the starting cornerback opposite Joe Haden after a miserable 2012 season. Teams repeatedly targeted the undersized Skrine, and receivers continued to beat him for receptions. And when Skrine wasn't getting beat, he was getting whistled for pass interference penalties. He was whistled for nine penalties last season, making him one of the most penalized players in the NFL last season. However, other than a flirtation with free agent cornerback Brent Grimes, who wound up signing with Miami, the Browns braintrust seemed content to go with Skrine, free agent signing Chris Owens and fourth-round draft pick Leon McFadden to lineup opposite shutdown corner Joe Haden this season. After a miserable first two games, Skrine's play improved the last few weeks and had been getting noticed by the Cleveland-area media. Unfortunately, all it took was a wet field and a Jacksonville Jaguars undrafted castoff named Jarrett Boykin to unravel all of that goodwill. Skrine was repeatedly victimized by Boykin, who came into the game with six career catches and one catch this season, and perennial All-Pro quarterback Aaron Rodgers on Sunday's 31-13 loss. Boykin finished with eight catches for 103 yards and his first-career touchdown. According to pro-football-reference.com, Skrine has been whistled for five penalties through seven games this season, including a costly pass interference infraction in the fourth quarter that led to Boykin's lone touchdown. At 5-foot-10, 160-pounds, Skrine is too small and short to hang with the bigger receivers in the NFL. Hopefully, the Browns braintrust has seen enough to know that they can't rely on him as a starter next season and be more aggressive in bringing in some upgrades in the defensive backfield.
3. Craig Robertson, ILB -- For five games, Robertson -- an undrafted rookie in 2012 out of North Texas -- was a perfect fit for defensive coordinator Ray Horton's 3-4 defense. Lining up next to tackling machine and 8-year veteran and captain D'Qwell Jackson, Robertson had been playing very well. Then came the Lions game, where Reggie Bush and Matthew Stafford exposed Robertson as someone who can't cover very well and who's tackling kills are suspect. Robertson was viewed as the main culprit defensively in their 31-23 loss to Detroit two weeks ago. And, it didn't take long for Rodgers to exploit him Sunday. It was Robertson who was the first player to whiff on Jermichael Finley's game-opening 10-yard touchdown reception, in which four Browns missed tackles on the big tight end in the open field. Robertson is third on the team with 28 tackles and has added two sacks, but his play has stood out like a sore thumb on a defense that has been gashed for 31 points in back-to-back weeks. Robertson may be a good special team guy or a good change-of-pace guy. However, the Browns may be in the market to find someone a bit more talented to line up next to Jackson on the inside next season.
4. Mitchell Schwartz, RT -- Last season, the second-round pick out of Cal got off to a slow start, but quickly showed the fans why then-GM Tom Heckert and then-president Mike Holmgren felt he was worth the 37th overall pick. Schwartz became, arguably, the best right tackle the Browns had ever had during the expansion era and led many fans to believe that the offensive line was one of the team's strengths. That was before this season. Schwartz has been miserable this season. Some fans thought it was exacerbated by playing with an inexperienced right guard in Oniel Cousins for the first few games, especially in the 23-10 season-opening loss to the Miami Dolphins. However, with regular starter Shawn Lavauo returning in the Buffalo game, Schwartz's play hasn't gotten any better. He's only been whistled for two penalties this season, but he's been abused by the left-edge pass rushers this season. Plus, the line has regressed in run blocking this season, which was supposedly a Schwartz strength coming out of college. Current general manager Mike Lombardi was very critical of the Browns' entire 2012 draft as a TV analyst, which included the drafting of Schwartz, so it's clear they wouldn't hesitate to replace him. They were also heavily rumored to be interested in former Jaguar tackle Eugene Monroe, who wound up being dealt to the Ravens, and Monroe would have stepped right in and replaced Schwartz. You can say that the sacks are the result of Brandon Weeden holding on to the ball for too long, but Brian Hoyer, who had a much quicker release, was sacked six times in two full games under center, so it's not just the quarterback's fault.
5. Brandon Weeden, QB -- I saved the most obvious choice for last. You won't find very many people in Cleveland defending Weeden at this point, with 90 percent of the fanbase ready to see if journeyman Jason Campbell can do better under center. Weeden entered this season knowing that the new regime did not draft him with the 22nd overall pick last season, nor did they particularly want him. With new head coach Rob Chudzinski, who turned journeyman Derek Anderson into a Pro Bowler here in Cleveland in 2007, and offensive guru Norv Turner coming to town, most people expected the big-armed Weeden to do well in the vertical-based attacking offense they were bringing. Most experts chalked up Weeden's struggles last season to playing in an offense he was ill-suited for, the West Coast offense favored by outgoing coach Pat Shurmur and Holmgren. Many believed that, if Weeden couldn't succeed in the Chudzinski-Turner offense, he wouldn't succeed anywhere in the NFL. Well, through seven games, it looks like the experts were right. Making matters worse for Weeden was injuring his thumb late in the Week 2 14-6 loss to Baltimore and watching third-stringer Brian Hoyer -- a Cleveland product -- succeed in his place. Weeden's play has regressed since coming back from the injury. Barring a miracle, it looks like the Browns will have a new quarterback next season, whether it's a rookie draft pick or a healthy Hoyer or a free agent who's not on the team currently. Weeden may have one last game to show the Browns and their frustrated fanbase that he's worthy of another shot, and against the defensively-tough 7-0 Kansas City Chiefs, that doesn't appear likely. While Jason Campbell isn't necessarily an upgrade, you can only stomach two ill-advised, "bone-headed" (as he called it) underhanded tosses per season. Weeden did it in back-to-back games. Who knows, maybe there is a surprise in store between now and Oct. 29 (the NFL trade deadline) and Nov. 5 (the start of the Browns' bye week).
These five Browns should realize that the clock is ticking on their respective careers. All five, at this moment, will be and should be replaced next season if this franchise wants to take the next logical step. It's up to Little, Skrine, Robertson, Schwartz and Weeden to prove that they belong.
Until next time, remember that Cleveland Rocks!
Showing posts with label Ray Horton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ray Horton. Show all posts
Monday, October 21, 2013
Monday, April 29, 2013
Draft dodging
The Browns' first full NFL Draft in the Jimmy Haslam III-Joe Banner-Mike Lombardi regime began under a cloud of ominousness, thanks to the FBI and IRS raiding Haslam's Pilot/Flying J Tennessee headquarters and charging the business with defrauding customers on rebates the company promised to them.
Haslam's reputation around Cleveland took a hit when this news hit the fan. Browns fans weren't happy with his status as a "crook." They were concerned about the status of the Browns' franchise if Haslam is indicted -- would Haslam be forced to sell, would the NFL take over the operations of the team while a buyer is found, you name it. Things even as far-fetched as the Browns eventually relocating from Cleveland again were brought up from paranoid Cleveland sports fans who have been through the ringer and back many times over the last 50 years.
The NFL Draft, which took place this past Thursday-through-Saturday, was going to be the welcome distraction from those fears and get fans focusing on football again.
With Haslam in the "War Room" all three days, what the Cleveland Browns was interesting, to say the least.
The Browns kept their sixth pick, despite a reported offer from the St. Louis Rams to trade down 10 spots, did not add a second round pick and wound up making three separate trades that allowed to land veteran wide receiver Devone Bess from the Miami Dolphins, a third-round pick in the 2014 draft from the (gasp) Pittsburgh Steelers and a fourth-round pick in the same draft from the Indianapolis Colts. The result of those three trades was no picks at all in rounds four and five, one pick in round six and two picks in round seven that the Browns used to draft some gambles -- either high-profile players who are coming off major injuries (like Notre Dame safety Jamoris Slaughter) or Division II players from small schools that could be projects.
In the end, the Browns only had two picks in the first 174 draft picks, wound up with five draft picks total, did not take a rookie quarterback (which several so-called draft experts were predicting and a few more in the Cleveland media were calling for) and wound up taking a top-notch pass rusher in LSU's Barkevious Mingo with the sixth-overall pick instead of Alabama cornerback Dee Milliner (who fell to the New York Jets at No. 9). They also wound up taking San Diego State cornerback Leon McFadden in the third round, just one pick higher than the Arizona Cardinals took a gamble on LSU's Tyrann "Honey Badger" Mathieu, who missed all of last season due to drug-related suspensions.
So, why does Joe Cleveland give them a passing grade for this when there are many (and I mean MANY) people -- pundits, media members and fans -- taking them to task for what they did?
With the fact that I've been openly against Mike Lombardi as the general manager and would look for any way to bash the heck out of the guy, and am not currently thrilled with the things going on with Haslam, I find myself defending what they did.
I've tried to be angry about it, but I simply cannot. In fact, I find myself defending the Browns more than I take them to task.
Heading into the first round, the Browns had reportedly worked out every high-profile quarterback in this draft -- Geno Smith, E.J. Manuel, Ryan Nassib, Matt Barkley, Mike Glennon -- to the point that everyone discarded what Joe Banner said last month and felt that the Browns would take a quarterback.
Maybe not at No. 6, but maybe so. Maybe they trade down and use that later first round pick or pick in the second to take a QB.
So, I feared that the Browns wound use that sixth pick to take a guy like Geno Smith, who I am very down on. I saw a few of his college games last year, and he just didn't look like a guy you could make a franchise quarterback. It seemed like he was one of those "flavor of the month" QBs because of the "flavor of the month" read-option offense that some NFL coaches are importing from the college ranks. My motto was simply -- "Anybody But Geno."
So, when the Browns took Mingo, I let out a loud cheer, mostly in relief. It wasn't Geno Smith, thank God. In fact, Smith was passed over by everyone in the first round and was chosen into the seventh pick of the second round by the Jets, who already had a logjam at quarterback that only got more muddled, even after they gave God's favorite player Tim Tebow his walking papers.
When Miami moved up to take Dion Jordan (the guy I wanted most) and the Eagles surprisingly took offensive lineman Lane Johnson, I figured the Browns weren't going to trade. The three offensive linemen looked the most promising, and having Lane Johnson fall to six would have prompted several teams to make the Browns an offer.
After Ziggy Ansah was drafted by the Lions, I felt that the Browns would take either Mingo or Milliner, with a fear that it would be Geno Smith. I was pleasantly surprised that it was Mingo.
M-I-N-G-O! And Mingo was his name-oh!
Can't you envision yourself at FirstEnergy Stadium over the next several years chanting "MINNNNNGOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...." every time he makes a big play? I sure can.
After Geno Smith and another other player with QB listed as his position, the player I didn't want the Browns to settle for was Milliner. Earlier, I wanted Milliner because he fit that everyone believed was the Browns' biggest need -- a starting cornerback opposite Joe Haden. However, more reports came out about his five surgeries and his most recent torn labrum surgery, along with reports that, while Milliner was the best cornerback in the draft, that doesn't necessarily make him a "shutdown" cornerback.
In other words, he was really good, but he wasn't quite elite.
Some questioned Mingo because the Browns had spent a lot of money in the offseason on adding pass rushers from the outside linebacker and defensive end spots. Paul Kruger from Baltimore was the high-profile signing, while Quinton Groves from Arizona and Desmond Bryant from Oakland were also additions that bring some blitzing ability that Ray Horton wants from his attacking 3-4 defense.
With former second-round pick Jabaal Sheard making the move from outside end to outside linebacker, many felt that the Browns would take themselves out of the running for one of the three highly-projected pass rushers in the draft -- Jordan, Ansah and Mingo. Instead, they wound up with Mingo.
Mingo is a physical freak -- with good size and speed and tackling ability, with the ability to put pressure on the quarterback. He was held to 4.5 sacks last year, which concerned some. However, LSU coach Les Miles conceded that the defensive scheme they used took away from Mingo's main strength and that he was mostly used to "stay home" and defend the read-option quarterbacks they went up against. Also, Mingo was exclusively a defensive end in college, and he'd be asked to move to linebacker in the NFL.
Mingo will compete with Sheard and Groves with one of the starting spots at outside linebacker.
Some fear that Mingo will end up like Kamieron Wimbley, the former top-draft choice by the Browns who was moved from end to linebacker, sacked the QB 11 times as a rookie but fell to earth and was subsequently traded two years later. Wimbley has since played for three other NFL teams and has carved out a nice career for himself, but he certainly did not become the elite pass rusher Phil Savage and Romeo Crennel envisioned when they traded with the Ravens to get him.
Where Wimbley struggled was because the Browns did not have any other pass-rush threats on their defense besides Wimbley. Teams double-teamed him. He also struggled with pass coverage. When Mike Holmgren and Tom Heckert came aboard with visions of switching to a 4-3 defense, they dealt Wimbley to the Raiders for a third-round pick that wound up becoming Colt McCoy.
Mingo comes into a much better situation than Wimbley did. He enters a position of sudden depth thanks to Kruger, Groves and Sheard. He can put his hand down and play end when the Browns employ that 4-3 look (which they plan on). He'll be counted on as a part of the rotation among the front seven that should keep the players fresh and, hopefully, wreak havoc on opposing offenses.
Mingo will be compared not only to Milliner, but also to Georgia linebacker Jarvis Jones, who fell all the way to No. 19 and was taken by the Steelers. Jones was red-flagged because of a spinal stenosis condition that could shave years off his career, along with poor workouts at both his pro day and the NFL combine. However, his 28 sacks over the last two years led the nation (compared to 11.5 sacks over that time frame by Mingo). There are some who felt that the Browns should have taken the trade that was reportedly offered by the Rams and moved down to No. 16 and taken Jones or Texas safety Kenny Vaccaro.
Unfortunately, Browns fans can be a fickle bunch. When the Browns traded down three times in the first round in 2009 (passing Mark Sanchez, Josh Freeman and Jeremy Maclin) and took center Alex Mack, fans complained. When the Browns traded down from No. 6 to No. 24 with the Falcons and wound up with nose tackle Phil Taylor and defensive end Sheard and receiver Greg Little, fans complained that they passed on receiver Julio Jones. When the Browns traded up last year to snag running back Trent Richardson, they complained they paid too steep a price (which also complaining that they didn't pay an even steeper price to try to draft Robert Griffin III).
Let's face it, you guys will complain about anything. If the Browns would have traded down, you would have complained they moved down too far. So, get over it.
Banner said he includes receiver Josh Gordon in this group, and he should. The Browns used their second-round pick on him in last year's supplemental draft. Had Gordon come out this year, he would have been a high first round pick and the top WR taken (ahead of Tavon Austin, who is too small for my tastes). Gordon's addition lifts the status of this draft, in my opinion, and Heckert should take a bow for it.
While the Honey Badger had flash and big-play ability with LSU, playing next to two former No. 1 draft picks in Patrick Peterson and Morris Claiborne, his off-the-field issues and his 5-8 stature worked against him. I felt the Browns would take a chance on him, but only if he fell to the fourth round. Instead, they took McFadden, a four-year starter in the pass-happy Mountain West Conference who, while also small, showed great coverage ability. I have no problems with that pick.
Honey Badger is the ultimate boom or bust pick. If he gets back to drugs, fails on the field, whatever, it's a pick that would have sealed Lombardi's fate. With the Cardinals, he has his old buddy Peterson in the locker room to try to help keep him in line. It's a better situation for him there to succeed than here, even though they already have one of his old teammates in Mingo here. Plus, with his size, Mathieu is more suited to be a nickel back and cover the inside recievers instead of the outside (early plans with Arizona have him moving to safety, which is odd).
Some folks were hoping the Browns would use their fourth and fifth round picks on the plethora of quarterbacks that dropped like stones in this draft. However, I am glad they did not. Guys like Nassib and Barkley fell for a reason. Then, they turn into yet another third- or fourth-round QB that the Browns take that teases fans for a bit but then fall to earth spectacularly. It's a big reason why this team has had trouble developing a long-term quarterback --they always settle for mid-round talent, give them a season or two, and then start over.
See Charlie Frye (third round), Colt McCoy (third round), Luke McCown (fourth round), Spurgeon Wynn (sixth round) and even Derek Anderson (sixth round with Baltimore) as QBs who teased fans with some solid play but flopped when they became the de-facto starting quarterback of the Cleveland Browns. As it is, both Barkley and Nassib were drafted in the fourth round before the Browns chose, so it was a moot point. But even a guy like Tyler Wilson of Arkansas, all he does is give fans false hope that they found the heir-apparent for Weeden and clamor for him when (and if) Weeden struggles. I'm about tired of QB drama in this town.
The Browns are giving Weeden at least one more to prove himself, and he deserves it. He was a first-round draft choice who had success in college and had intangibles that many scouts love (good size, a big arm, etc.) He's in an offense tailored to his strengths that Rob Chudzinski and Norv Turner are bringing to town. He'll also have a better receiving corps to throw to with the additions of Bess and David Nelson, along with the returns of Gordon, Little, Travis Benjamin, Jordan Norwood and Josh Cooper, along with a (hopefully) healthier Trent Richardson running the ball and an improved offensive line.
If he fails, the Browns suddenly are armed with assets in the 2014 draft to try to make a move to land one of the top quarterbacks in next year's class (Teddy Bridgewater, Johnny Manziel, A.J. McCarron, etc.) And that's due to those trades with the Steelers and Colts that everyone complained about.
Some think that the Browns doing what they did in this draft signifies that they are playing for next year already. I don't get that vibe. So, they didn't take a player in the fourth and fifth round. I don't remember a lot of All-Pros coming out of the fourth and fifth round. This is where the Browns typically find players like Owen Marecic, Buster Skrine, James-Michael Johnson, Travis Benjamin, etc. Nice players, but are they going to be studs in the NFL? Doubtful. Most fans are ready to run Marecic and Skrine out of town, as am I? So, they didn't waste a draft pick on a guy that, most likely, wouldn't start on this team and be a training camp body, and they got higher assets in next year's draft for them. Good for them. A solid business move, if you ask me.
I would expect the Browns to become players in the second phase of free agency, that usually heats up after June 1 when players get cut due to contract deadlines. That's where you'll find your depth and special teams help, and, potentially, another starter to go with your existing crew.
I give the draft an early B-, but in reality, how can you legitimately grade a draft two days after it's over when none of these players have gone through training camp or played in a game yet? Last year, there were fans crying that the Browns took Weeden over guard David DeCastro, and then DeCastro suffered a serious injury and missed most of his rookie season with the Steelers. Still crying?
Honestly, what the Browns did in this draft is something most of us aren't used to seeing, which is why some of us are outraged. Would it have helped to add in eight rookie draft picks again? No, it wouldn't have.
I'm willing to give Banner and Co. the benefit of the doubt. I was high on Mingo and was happy they drafted him, and I like the McFadden pick the more I see it. And, let's rejoice for a second that there won't be a quarterback controversy this year.
Until next time, remember that Cleveland Rocks!
Haslam's reputation around Cleveland took a hit when this news hit the fan. Browns fans weren't happy with his status as a "crook." They were concerned about the status of the Browns' franchise if Haslam is indicted -- would Haslam be forced to sell, would the NFL take over the operations of the team while a buyer is found, you name it. Things even as far-fetched as the Browns eventually relocating from Cleveland again were brought up from paranoid Cleveland sports fans who have been through the ringer and back many times over the last 50 years.
The NFL Draft, which took place this past Thursday-through-Saturday, was going to be the welcome distraction from those fears and get fans focusing on football again.
With Haslam in the "War Room" all three days, what the Cleveland Browns was interesting, to say the least.
The Browns kept their sixth pick, despite a reported offer from the St. Louis Rams to trade down 10 spots, did not add a second round pick and wound up making three separate trades that allowed to land veteran wide receiver Devone Bess from the Miami Dolphins, a third-round pick in the 2014 draft from the (gasp) Pittsburgh Steelers and a fourth-round pick in the same draft from the Indianapolis Colts. The result of those three trades was no picks at all in rounds four and five, one pick in round six and two picks in round seven that the Browns used to draft some gambles -- either high-profile players who are coming off major injuries (like Notre Dame safety Jamoris Slaughter) or Division II players from small schools that could be projects.
In the end, the Browns only had two picks in the first 174 draft picks, wound up with five draft picks total, did not take a rookie quarterback (which several so-called draft experts were predicting and a few more in the Cleveland media were calling for) and wound up taking a top-notch pass rusher in LSU's Barkevious Mingo with the sixth-overall pick instead of Alabama cornerback Dee Milliner (who fell to the New York Jets at No. 9). They also wound up taking San Diego State cornerback Leon McFadden in the third round, just one pick higher than the Arizona Cardinals took a gamble on LSU's Tyrann "Honey Badger" Mathieu, who missed all of last season due to drug-related suspensions.
So, why does Joe Cleveland give them a passing grade for this when there are many (and I mean MANY) people -- pundits, media members and fans -- taking them to task for what they did?
With the fact that I've been openly against Mike Lombardi as the general manager and would look for any way to bash the heck out of the guy, and am not currently thrilled with the things going on with Haslam, I find myself defending what they did.
I've tried to be angry about it, but I simply cannot. In fact, I find myself defending the Browns more than I take them to task.
Heading into the first round, the Browns had reportedly worked out every high-profile quarterback in this draft -- Geno Smith, E.J. Manuel, Ryan Nassib, Matt Barkley, Mike Glennon -- to the point that everyone discarded what Joe Banner said last month and felt that the Browns would take a quarterback.
Maybe not at No. 6, but maybe so. Maybe they trade down and use that later first round pick or pick in the second to take a QB.
So, I feared that the Browns wound use that sixth pick to take a guy like Geno Smith, who I am very down on. I saw a few of his college games last year, and he just didn't look like a guy you could make a franchise quarterback. It seemed like he was one of those "flavor of the month" QBs because of the "flavor of the month" read-option offense that some NFL coaches are importing from the college ranks. My motto was simply -- "Anybody But Geno."
So, when the Browns took Mingo, I let out a loud cheer, mostly in relief. It wasn't Geno Smith, thank God. In fact, Smith was passed over by everyone in the first round and was chosen into the seventh pick of the second round by the Jets, who already had a logjam at quarterback that only got more muddled, even after they gave God's favorite player Tim Tebow his walking papers.
When Miami moved up to take Dion Jordan (the guy I wanted most) and the Eagles surprisingly took offensive lineman Lane Johnson, I figured the Browns weren't going to trade. The three offensive linemen looked the most promising, and having Lane Johnson fall to six would have prompted several teams to make the Browns an offer.
After Ziggy Ansah was drafted by the Lions, I felt that the Browns would take either Mingo or Milliner, with a fear that it would be Geno Smith. I was pleasantly surprised that it was Mingo.
M-I-N-G-O! And Mingo was his name-oh!
Can't you envision yourself at FirstEnergy Stadium over the next several years chanting "MINNNNNGOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...." every time he makes a big play? I sure can.
After Geno Smith and another other player with QB listed as his position, the player I didn't want the Browns to settle for was Milliner. Earlier, I wanted Milliner because he fit that everyone believed was the Browns' biggest need -- a starting cornerback opposite Joe Haden. However, more reports came out about his five surgeries and his most recent torn labrum surgery, along with reports that, while Milliner was the best cornerback in the draft, that doesn't necessarily make him a "shutdown" cornerback.
In other words, he was really good, but he wasn't quite elite.
Some questioned Mingo because the Browns had spent a lot of money in the offseason on adding pass rushers from the outside linebacker and defensive end spots. Paul Kruger from Baltimore was the high-profile signing, while Quinton Groves from Arizona and Desmond Bryant from Oakland were also additions that bring some blitzing ability that Ray Horton wants from his attacking 3-4 defense.
With former second-round pick Jabaal Sheard making the move from outside end to outside linebacker, many felt that the Browns would take themselves out of the running for one of the three highly-projected pass rushers in the draft -- Jordan, Ansah and Mingo. Instead, they wound up with Mingo.
Mingo is a physical freak -- with good size and speed and tackling ability, with the ability to put pressure on the quarterback. He was held to 4.5 sacks last year, which concerned some. However, LSU coach Les Miles conceded that the defensive scheme they used took away from Mingo's main strength and that he was mostly used to "stay home" and defend the read-option quarterbacks they went up against. Also, Mingo was exclusively a defensive end in college, and he'd be asked to move to linebacker in the NFL.
Mingo will compete with Sheard and Groves with one of the starting spots at outside linebacker.
Some fear that Mingo will end up like Kamieron Wimbley, the former top-draft choice by the Browns who was moved from end to linebacker, sacked the QB 11 times as a rookie but fell to earth and was subsequently traded two years later. Wimbley has since played for three other NFL teams and has carved out a nice career for himself, but he certainly did not become the elite pass rusher Phil Savage and Romeo Crennel envisioned when they traded with the Ravens to get him.
Where Wimbley struggled was because the Browns did not have any other pass-rush threats on their defense besides Wimbley. Teams double-teamed him. He also struggled with pass coverage. When Mike Holmgren and Tom Heckert came aboard with visions of switching to a 4-3 defense, they dealt Wimbley to the Raiders for a third-round pick that wound up becoming Colt McCoy.
Mingo comes into a much better situation than Wimbley did. He enters a position of sudden depth thanks to Kruger, Groves and Sheard. He can put his hand down and play end when the Browns employ that 4-3 look (which they plan on). He'll be counted on as a part of the rotation among the front seven that should keep the players fresh and, hopefully, wreak havoc on opposing offenses.
Mingo will be compared not only to Milliner, but also to Georgia linebacker Jarvis Jones, who fell all the way to No. 19 and was taken by the Steelers. Jones was red-flagged because of a spinal stenosis condition that could shave years off his career, along with poor workouts at both his pro day and the NFL combine. However, his 28 sacks over the last two years led the nation (compared to 11.5 sacks over that time frame by Mingo). There are some who felt that the Browns should have taken the trade that was reportedly offered by the Rams and moved down to No. 16 and taken Jones or Texas safety Kenny Vaccaro.
Unfortunately, Browns fans can be a fickle bunch. When the Browns traded down three times in the first round in 2009 (passing Mark Sanchez, Josh Freeman and Jeremy Maclin) and took center Alex Mack, fans complained. When the Browns traded down from No. 6 to No. 24 with the Falcons and wound up with nose tackle Phil Taylor and defensive end Sheard and receiver Greg Little, fans complained that they passed on receiver Julio Jones. When the Browns traded up last year to snag running back Trent Richardson, they complained they paid too steep a price (which also complaining that they didn't pay an even steeper price to try to draft Robert Griffin III).
Let's face it, you guys will complain about anything. If the Browns would have traded down, you would have complained they moved down too far. So, get over it.
Banner said he includes receiver Josh Gordon in this group, and he should. The Browns used their second-round pick on him in last year's supplemental draft. Had Gordon come out this year, he would have been a high first round pick and the top WR taken (ahead of Tavon Austin, who is too small for my tastes). Gordon's addition lifts the status of this draft, in my opinion, and Heckert should take a bow for it.
While the Honey Badger had flash and big-play ability with LSU, playing next to two former No. 1 draft picks in Patrick Peterson and Morris Claiborne, his off-the-field issues and his 5-8 stature worked against him. I felt the Browns would take a chance on him, but only if he fell to the fourth round. Instead, they took McFadden, a four-year starter in the pass-happy Mountain West Conference who, while also small, showed great coverage ability. I have no problems with that pick.
Honey Badger is the ultimate boom or bust pick. If he gets back to drugs, fails on the field, whatever, it's a pick that would have sealed Lombardi's fate. With the Cardinals, he has his old buddy Peterson in the locker room to try to help keep him in line. It's a better situation for him there to succeed than here, even though they already have one of his old teammates in Mingo here. Plus, with his size, Mathieu is more suited to be a nickel back and cover the inside recievers instead of the outside (early plans with Arizona have him moving to safety, which is odd).
Some folks were hoping the Browns would use their fourth and fifth round picks on the plethora of quarterbacks that dropped like stones in this draft. However, I am glad they did not. Guys like Nassib and Barkley fell for a reason. Then, they turn into yet another third- or fourth-round QB that the Browns take that teases fans for a bit but then fall to earth spectacularly. It's a big reason why this team has had trouble developing a long-term quarterback --they always settle for mid-round talent, give them a season or two, and then start over.
See Charlie Frye (third round), Colt McCoy (third round), Luke McCown (fourth round), Spurgeon Wynn (sixth round) and even Derek Anderson (sixth round with Baltimore) as QBs who teased fans with some solid play but flopped when they became the de-facto starting quarterback of the Cleveland Browns. As it is, both Barkley and Nassib were drafted in the fourth round before the Browns chose, so it was a moot point. But even a guy like Tyler Wilson of Arkansas, all he does is give fans false hope that they found the heir-apparent for Weeden and clamor for him when (and if) Weeden struggles. I'm about tired of QB drama in this town.
The Browns are giving Weeden at least one more to prove himself, and he deserves it. He was a first-round draft choice who had success in college and had intangibles that many scouts love (good size, a big arm, etc.) He's in an offense tailored to his strengths that Rob Chudzinski and Norv Turner are bringing to town. He'll also have a better receiving corps to throw to with the additions of Bess and David Nelson, along with the returns of Gordon, Little, Travis Benjamin, Jordan Norwood and Josh Cooper, along with a (hopefully) healthier Trent Richardson running the ball and an improved offensive line.
If he fails, the Browns suddenly are armed with assets in the 2014 draft to try to make a move to land one of the top quarterbacks in next year's class (Teddy Bridgewater, Johnny Manziel, A.J. McCarron, etc.) And that's due to those trades with the Steelers and Colts that everyone complained about.
Some think that the Browns doing what they did in this draft signifies that they are playing for next year already. I don't get that vibe. So, they didn't take a player in the fourth and fifth round. I don't remember a lot of All-Pros coming out of the fourth and fifth round. This is where the Browns typically find players like Owen Marecic, Buster Skrine, James-Michael Johnson, Travis Benjamin, etc. Nice players, but are they going to be studs in the NFL? Doubtful. Most fans are ready to run Marecic and Skrine out of town, as am I? So, they didn't waste a draft pick on a guy that, most likely, wouldn't start on this team and be a training camp body, and they got higher assets in next year's draft for them. Good for them. A solid business move, if you ask me.
I would expect the Browns to become players in the second phase of free agency, that usually heats up after June 1 when players get cut due to contract deadlines. That's where you'll find your depth and special teams help, and, potentially, another starter to go with your existing crew.
I give the draft an early B-, but in reality, how can you legitimately grade a draft two days after it's over when none of these players have gone through training camp or played in a game yet? Last year, there were fans crying that the Browns took Weeden over guard David DeCastro, and then DeCastro suffered a serious injury and missed most of his rookie season with the Steelers. Still crying?
Honestly, what the Browns did in this draft is something most of us aren't used to seeing, which is why some of us are outraged. Would it have helped to add in eight rookie draft picks again? No, it wouldn't have.
I'm willing to give Banner and Co. the benefit of the doubt. I was high on Mingo and was happy they drafted him, and I like the McFadden pick the more I see it. And, let's rejoice for a second that there won't be a quarterback controversy this year.
Until next time, remember that Cleveland Rocks!
Friday, March 15, 2013
The forgotten man
Not many people would respond to this job opening:
"NFL team with new ownership group of a formerly storied franchise seeking new general manager/personnel director that will be hired after the head coach and will report directly to the CEO. If you've had a disasterous tenure with this franchise before, so be it. You will likely be blamed when/if things fail and just be considered 'part of the process' when/if things succeed. Please contact Jimmy Haslam III and Joe Banner with your interest at 76 Lou Groza Blvd., Berea, OH."
In fact, only two known candidates did emerge. One wound up being hired to be the assistant general manager -- Ray Farmer. The other got the job -- Mike Lombardi.
Lombardi must have been desperate for any NFL job after five years of exile, being relegated to a talking head on television, serving as an "NFL insider" of sorts.
He must have been desperate to know that that job opening was in Cleveland, where he worked in the early 1990s with Bill Belichick and managed to anger media members and fans so bad, that 17 years after the franchise moved to Baltimore and he was told to not come along for the ride, they still held anger and resentment whenever his name came up or he appeared on the radio or television.
He must have been desperate to go to a team that he did nothing but trash from his perch on TV, questioning the moves to acquire several players that are still on the team and that he'll have to look in the eye at team headquarters -- if he ever appears.
He must have been desperate to know that he'll never get credit for anything that goes right with the Browns, but if things go wrong, Banner would not hesitate to hold his carcass in front of him so it can be riddled with bullets from the media, season ticket holders, fans and his own boss, Haslam.
Lombardi is in such a no-win situation that, even when it gets announced that his job title changes from Vice President of Player Personnel to General Manager, he doesn't get to answer questions about it and only a hastily called conference call by Banner would address it.
Lombardi had to feel good to beat out Farmer for the job, but then had to recoil when Farmer was added to the front office and given the title of his assistant. Looks like the Browns have already lined up his replacement, and he's only been on the job for a few months.
Since his disasterous introductary press conference, where the press came out firing with 17 years of pent up ammunition at him, Banner and Haslam, Lombardi has not made a public appearance with his new team.
When the Browns went to the NFL Combine, the only personnel made available to the media were Banner and new head coach Rob Chudzinski. No Lombardi.
When the Browns made their first free agent signings this week -- Ravens linebacker Paul Kruger, Raiders defensive lineman Desmond Bryant and Cardinals linebacker Quinton Groves -- Banner and Chudzinski sat in front of the press with the players and discussed the signings. The general manager? Nowhere to be found.
This week, the Browns sent out their forms to season ticket holders seeking their renewal. On the first page of the pamphlet was a photo of Haslam and Banner together. Below it were photos of Chudzinski, offensive coordinator Norv Turner and defensive coordinator Ray Horton.
Guess who's photo wasn't included? Guess who's name wasn't even mentioned?
Yep, Lombardi.
Perhaps Haslam and Banner didn't realize the deep resentment attached to Lombardi in this region until they actually hired him. But it seems pretty certain that Haslam and Banner have gone out of their way to deemphsize his role within the organization, even with an upgraded title to GM.
The hiring of Farmer didn't come until AFTER Lombardi's grilling by the press. The only way they could hire him was to give him a "promotion," so they had to give him the title of assistant GM. However, there was no official GM, so Lombardi was given the title. So, it seems they begrudgingly gave Lombardi a title only so Farmer could join their front office.
How's that for a ringing vote of confidence?
Lombardi appears to be on a very short leash. The media is just waiting, like dogs salivating over a piece of steak, for Lombardi to screw up so they can tear him apart.
Perhaps Lombardi was brought on as nothing more than a glorified fall guy for Banner and Chudzinski. Think about it.
Banner's dour personality (some say he resembles the Dr. No character from the James Bond movies) did not sit well with Eagles fans, and it was starting to rub some Browns fans the wrong way. Perhaps Banner needed someone who was reviled even worse to make him look better, the Ugly Duckling Theory, if you will.
Browns fans have also been notoriously unkind to head coaches, especially those who came in without any head coaching experience. The last two head coaches -- Eric Mangini and Pat Shurmur -- each barely last two seasons in Cleveland, with the buzzards circling their carcasses even before that second year began.
The only coach to take the Browns to the playoffs during the expansion era -- Butch Davis -- didn't even last four full seasons, resigning with five games left in 2004 due to "panic attacks." Terry Robiskie only won his final game as the interim head coach that year and was so lightly regarded around the NFL, he took a demotion to wide receivers coach when Romeo Crennel was hired.
Crennel lasted four full seasons, but always seemed to be dodging bullets. Only an out-of-nowhere 10-6 2007 season bought him an extension, but when his team slumped to 4-12 the following year and the general manager who hired him, Phil Savage, became an embarassment, he was shown the door.
Some Browns fans were ready to jump on Chudzinski when he was hired, especially when Haslam and Banner talked a lot about seeking a "dynamic leader" to be the head coach. This, despite Chudzinski being a native Ohioan who not only grew up a diehard Browns fan, but was moderately successful in his two previous stints as a Browns assistant coach.
With a figure so reviled like Lombardi in the building, suddenly fan sentiment has softened on Chud. Sure, his hiring of proven commodoties like Turner and Horton to run his offense and defense didn't hurt one bit. But, with the human shield in the building, Chud may not take as many bullets. If his team doesn't get off to a great start, unlike Mangini, Shurmur and every other head coach that preceeded them, Chud won't have to be the fall guy or the target.
I have a feeling that, win or lose, Lombardi won't last very long with the Browns organization. As someone with a large ego, I'm sure it has to bother him to be used as somewhat of a foil in this organization. Even if the Browns do very well this season, Lombardi could leave with his reputation somewhat intact and say that he was only here "to help this regime get off the ground" and go back to the comforts of TV or to another team that will let him be the dominant voice of the organization.
Sure, even though most fans and media know that Banner is the lead voice in the football organization, you don't think they'll pass up the opportunity to rip Lombardi a new one if any of the free agent signings fail to pan out or they have a bad draft? There are some members of the media (one rhymes with Bony Schmossi) who would take personal delight in running Lombardi out of town for the second time, even knowingly overlooking the Banner factor.
This is the hell that is Lombardi's second tenure as the Browns' general manager/director of personnel. He asked for it, and he's going to get it. And, Joe Cleveland certainly doesn't feel sorry for him.
This is what you get when you compile a video list of lowlights and embarassing plays on company time just so you can run a beloved quarterback and ambassador to the town out of it. Joe Cleveland ddn't forget, and neither did a lot of Browns fans and media, apparently.
Happy hunting!
Until next time, remember that Cleveland Rocks!
"NFL team with new ownership group of a formerly storied franchise seeking new general manager/personnel director that will be hired after the head coach and will report directly to the CEO. If you've had a disasterous tenure with this franchise before, so be it. You will likely be blamed when/if things fail and just be considered 'part of the process' when/if things succeed. Please contact Jimmy Haslam III and Joe Banner with your interest at 76 Lou Groza Blvd., Berea, OH."
In fact, only two known candidates did emerge. One wound up being hired to be the assistant general manager -- Ray Farmer. The other got the job -- Mike Lombardi.
Lombardi must have been desperate for any NFL job after five years of exile, being relegated to a talking head on television, serving as an "NFL insider" of sorts.
He must have been desperate to know that that job opening was in Cleveland, where he worked in the early 1990s with Bill Belichick and managed to anger media members and fans so bad, that 17 years after the franchise moved to Baltimore and he was told to not come along for the ride, they still held anger and resentment whenever his name came up or he appeared on the radio or television.
He must have been desperate to go to a team that he did nothing but trash from his perch on TV, questioning the moves to acquire several players that are still on the team and that he'll have to look in the eye at team headquarters -- if he ever appears.
He must have been desperate to know that he'll never get credit for anything that goes right with the Browns, but if things go wrong, Banner would not hesitate to hold his carcass in front of him so it can be riddled with bullets from the media, season ticket holders, fans and his own boss, Haslam.
Lombardi is in such a no-win situation that, even when it gets announced that his job title changes from Vice President of Player Personnel to General Manager, he doesn't get to answer questions about it and only a hastily called conference call by Banner would address it.
Lombardi had to feel good to beat out Farmer for the job, but then had to recoil when Farmer was added to the front office and given the title of his assistant. Looks like the Browns have already lined up his replacement, and he's only been on the job for a few months.
Since his disasterous introductary press conference, where the press came out firing with 17 years of pent up ammunition at him, Banner and Haslam, Lombardi has not made a public appearance with his new team.
When the Browns went to the NFL Combine, the only personnel made available to the media were Banner and new head coach Rob Chudzinski. No Lombardi.
When the Browns made their first free agent signings this week -- Ravens linebacker Paul Kruger, Raiders defensive lineman Desmond Bryant and Cardinals linebacker Quinton Groves -- Banner and Chudzinski sat in front of the press with the players and discussed the signings. The general manager? Nowhere to be found.
This week, the Browns sent out their forms to season ticket holders seeking their renewal. On the first page of the pamphlet was a photo of Haslam and Banner together. Below it were photos of Chudzinski, offensive coordinator Norv Turner and defensive coordinator Ray Horton.
Guess who's photo wasn't included? Guess who's name wasn't even mentioned?
Yep, Lombardi.
Perhaps Haslam and Banner didn't realize the deep resentment attached to Lombardi in this region until they actually hired him. But it seems pretty certain that Haslam and Banner have gone out of their way to deemphsize his role within the organization, even with an upgraded title to GM.
The hiring of Farmer didn't come until AFTER Lombardi's grilling by the press. The only way they could hire him was to give him a "promotion," so they had to give him the title of assistant GM. However, there was no official GM, so Lombardi was given the title. So, it seems they begrudgingly gave Lombardi a title only so Farmer could join their front office.
How's that for a ringing vote of confidence?
Lombardi appears to be on a very short leash. The media is just waiting, like dogs salivating over a piece of steak, for Lombardi to screw up so they can tear him apart.
Perhaps Lombardi was brought on as nothing more than a glorified fall guy for Banner and Chudzinski. Think about it.
Banner's dour personality (some say he resembles the Dr. No character from the James Bond movies) did not sit well with Eagles fans, and it was starting to rub some Browns fans the wrong way. Perhaps Banner needed someone who was reviled even worse to make him look better, the Ugly Duckling Theory, if you will.
Browns fans have also been notoriously unkind to head coaches, especially those who came in without any head coaching experience. The last two head coaches -- Eric Mangini and Pat Shurmur -- each barely last two seasons in Cleveland, with the buzzards circling their carcasses even before that second year began.
The only coach to take the Browns to the playoffs during the expansion era -- Butch Davis -- didn't even last four full seasons, resigning with five games left in 2004 due to "panic attacks." Terry Robiskie only won his final game as the interim head coach that year and was so lightly regarded around the NFL, he took a demotion to wide receivers coach when Romeo Crennel was hired.
Crennel lasted four full seasons, but always seemed to be dodging bullets. Only an out-of-nowhere 10-6 2007 season bought him an extension, but when his team slumped to 4-12 the following year and the general manager who hired him, Phil Savage, became an embarassment, he was shown the door.
Some Browns fans were ready to jump on Chudzinski when he was hired, especially when Haslam and Banner talked a lot about seeking a "dynamic leader" to be the head coach. This, despite Chudzinski being a native Ohioan who not only grew up a diehard Browns fan, but was moderately successful in his two previous stints as a Browns assistant coach.
With a figure so reviled like Lombardi in the building, suddenly fan sentiment has softened on Chud. Sure, his hiring of proven commodoties like Turner and Horton to run his offense and defense didn't hurt one bit. But, with the human shield in the building, Chud may not take as many bullets. If his team doesn't get off to a great start, unlike Mangini, Shurmur and every other head coach that preceeded them, Chud won't have to be the fall guy or the target.
I have a feeling that, win or lose, Lombardi won't last very long with the Browns organization. As someone with a large ego, I'm sure it has to bother him to be used as somewhat of a foil in this organization. Even if the Browns do very well this season, Lombardi could leave with his reputation somewhat intact and say that he was only here "to help this regime get off the ground" and go back to the comforts of TV or to another team that will let him be the dominant voice of the organization.
Sure, even though most fans and media know that Banner is the lead voice in the football organization, you don't think they'll pass up the opportunity to rip Lombardi a new one if any of the free agent signings fail to pan out or they have a bad draft? There are some members of the media (one rhymes with Bony Schmossi) who would take personal delight in running Lombardi out of town for the second time, even knowingly overlooking the Banner factor.
This is the hell that is Lombardi's second tenure as the Browns' general manager/director of personnel. He asked for it, and he's going to get it. And, Joe Cleveland certainly doesn't feel sorry for him.
This is what you get when you compile a video list of lowlights and embarassing plays on company time just so you can run a beloved quarterback and ambassador to the town out of it. Joe Cleveland ddn't forget, and neither did a lot of Browns fans and media, apparently.
Happy hunting!
Until next time, remember that Cleveland Rocks!
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Clean slate, but a short leash
There's no secret as to Joe Cleveland's feelings about Michael Lombardi, who came back to Cleveland a few days ago as Jimmy Haslam's and Joe Banner's choice as Vice President of Player Personnel.
In case you need a refresher course, here's the blog I wrote about Lombardi just a month ago, when he was heavily rumored to be the de-facto replacement for general manager Tom Heckert:
http://joeclevelandblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/no-trophy-for-this-lombardi.html
Joe Cleveland woke up Thursday to the news that Lombardi was introduced as the new GM and wished that he was still having a nightmare. Unfortunately, it wasn't the case.
It was funny to see the images contrast between the press conferences announcing Rob Chudzinski's hiring to the hiring of Lombardi. Just a week ago, Banner and Haslam were all smiles flanking Chud. One week later, Haslam and Banner wore dour grins flanking Lombardi as the Cleveland media raked all three over the coals.
Lombardi began his press conference begging for a "clean slate" and for people to be "fair." Banner, who said that he "went out on an extreme limb" to land Lombardi, also echoed those "fair" statements. Essentially, they are trying to paint the media with a brush, so that if they (and rightly so) lambaste Lombardi's first questionable move, it will show that the media just isn't giving him a chance.
Oh, they may give him a chance. Browns fans who have almost universally ripped this move a new one, may give him a chance.
But it won't come with a long leash, that's for sure.
Just when it seemed that Browns fans were accepting Chud's hiring (especially in light of some of the other NFL coaching hires in his wake, including Chip Kelly's wishy-washy flip-flop maneuver to take over the Eagles), especially considering the hiring of Norv Turner as his offensive coordinator and Ray Horton, who interviewed for the Browns head coaching job before Chud, as his defensive coordinator, that Brown and Orange balloon loudly burst with a pinprick named Lombardi.
CBS play-by-play voice Jim Nantz came on a Cleveland radio station the day of Lombardi's hiring defending it, while also ripping several members of the Cleveland media for having "personal vendettas" against him. Tony Grossi, who has been accused of personal vendettas many times during his long career covering the Browns here, and Bud Shaw were the two main culprits.
Nantz is also a friend of both Lombardi and Patriots head coach Bill Belichick (and wasn't shy about admitting that fact several times during the interview), so his take can be skewered as well.
While Banner admits to going out on a limb, Haslam proclaims that he talked to numerous NFL owners who told him, "if you have the chance to hire Lombardi, don't hesitate to pounce." I can only imagine those guys were holding back snickers and guffawing after hanging up the phone with Haslam if that was the case.
If all those owners were really sold on Lombardi, than why was he a TV network shill for the last five years? Why didn't all of those other owners bring him in if he was such a "slam-dunk personnel hire?"
If he and Belichick were so closely connected at the hip, why did Belichick never hire Lombardi officially with New England? He certainly had several chances to do so, and if he did, the Boston media and fans that still call him a "genius" for winning three Super Bowls in four years (albeit with the help of some illegal videotaping, but so be it) would have accepted it.
Bill Belichick could take a dump in the middle of Downtown Boston, and it would be lauded as a great thing.
But yet, Belichick kept Lombardi at arms length during his lengthy coaching career in New England, only using him as an unofficial consultant. He did hire his son, Mick, in his scouting department, but that's not the same as hiring the man himself.
Everywhere Lombardi has gone where he's stayed for a while has been a failure. Especially his time in Cleveland during the early 1990s.
I don't need to rehash all the gory details.
Perhaps Banner, realizing that the Cleveland media and fanbase were turning on him, decided to deflect some of that criticism by bringing in the main pariah, Lombardi, to take some of the heat on him. Sure, he'll still be zinged as the guy who ultimately made the call to hire Lombardi (no one believes Haslam hired him). However, if things go south, Lombardi is the ready-made fall guy.
Perhaps they brought him in knowing that they need to win and win now. Banner proclaimed there was no such thing as a "five-year plan" under him, and with this hire, that is certainly the case. Anything less than a 7-9 season will definitely turn up the heat on Banner and Lombardi.
Perhaps Lombardi gives Chud a free pass. Suddenly, folks aren't complaining that much about Chud and his "inexperience." Now, if Chud struggles, the media and fans will blame Lombardi's personnel decisions.
Lombardi is the Hyde to Chud's Jeckyl. That may be how Haslam wants it.
In the past, the coach (Pat Shurmur) got lambasted while the GM (Heckert) was lauded. In the beginning, Phil Savage was lauded while Romeo Crennel was lambasted (that quickly turned into both being lambasted on their way out the door). In Haslam and Banner's mind, why not bring in the GM that the media and fans already dislike to take the heat off their hand-picked young rising star of a coach?
Unfortunately for Belichick, it didn't work that way during his time in Cleveland. The fans and media turned on him when it became apparent that he influenced the Dead Judas to squeeze Ernie Accorsi out the door and give Lombardi more front office responsibilities, essentially taking Accorsi's job. When it came out that Lombardi was the impetus behind Bernie Kosar's benching and subsequent release, the media and fans ripped him apart. Both men were pariahs during that final 1995 season as the team slumped from 11-5 while the franchise was in an upheaval to Baltimore.
Lombardi needs to strike gold with EVERYTHING that he does in order to keep the sharks at bay. Never has a person been hired to Cleveland who is under immense pressure to succeed from Day 1 as Lombardi is, and most of it is self-imposed.
Lombardi wasn't shy in ripping the Browns organization from his media perch after his departure. Recently, he shredded Heckert's draft, saying the drafting of Brandon Weeden was a "panicked disaster," saying that Mitchell Schwartz and John Hughes were "substantial reaches," saying that they gave up too much to move up to get Trent Richardson and then ripping them for "throwing away" a second round pick on Josh Gordon in the supplemental draft.
Now, Lombardi takes over a team where his starting quarterback is the panicked disaster, the "reaches" are his starting right tackle and key defensive line depth, his starting tailback is the guy they should have never moved up to get and his best wide receiver is the guy they "threw away" a pick on. Gordon Tweeted out, "Uh-oh, am I in trouble?" upon hearing Lombardi was hired, which shows these guys watched the NFL Network and read up on this guy.
Good luck with that, Mike.
It amazes me that an ownership group that oozed positive PR upon their debut has done such an opposite thing, especially since the media and fans were not shy about letting their feelings on Lombardi be known when it was rumored back in October that he'd be coming in. Cleveland fans have long memories.
Who knows, perhaps there is a method to their madness.
If you think about it, most every regime change was lauded by the media and fanbase. Butch Davis? Fans loved it. Phil Savage? Fans loved it. Eric Mangini? Fans (at first) loved it. Mike Holmgren? Fans loved it. All of those hires failed.
Maybe the fans hate is a good thing. Maybe the opposite reaction will get the desired action. Who knows.
Lombardi has quickly taken Chris Antonetti and Mark Sharpiro's role away as most hated Cleveland sports executive, and he hasn't even made an official move yet. That's saying something.
The Browns put themselves square in the bulls-eye with this hiring. The honeymoon is over for Jimmy Haslam. Fans are threatening to cancel their season ticket orders as a result. They are now under pressure to win and to do well. Anything less, and the short leash will be snapped back on Lombardi.
As a lifelong Browns fan who is optimistic that they will reach (and win) a Super Bowl or two during my lifetime, I can only hope they know what they are doing. As a fanbase, we can only trust Haslam and Banner that they are not the same-old, same-old when it comes to Cleveland sports owners and there is a method to their madness.
Until next time, remember that Cleveland Rocks!
In case you need a refresher course, here's the blog I wrote about Lombardi just a month ago, when he was heavily rumored to be the de-facto replacement for general manager Tom Heckert:
http://joeclevelandblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/no-trophy-for-this-lombardi.html
Joe Cleveland woke up Thursday to the news that Lombardi was introduced as the new GM and wished that he was still having a nightmare. Unfortunately, it wasn't the case.
It was funny to see the images contrast between the press conferences announcing Rob Chudzinski's hiring to the hiring of Lombardi. Just a week ago, Banner and Haslam were all smiles flanking Chud. One week later, Haslam and Banner wore dour grins flanking Lombardi as the Cleveland media raked all three over the coals.
Lombardi began his press conference begging for a "clean slate" and for people to be "fair." Banner, who said that he "went out on an extreme limb" to land Lombardi, also echoed those "fair" statements. Essentially, they are trying to paint the media with a brush, so that if they (and rightly so) lambaste Lombardi's first questionable move, it will show that the media just isn't giving him a chance.
Oh, they may give him a chance. Browns fans who have almost universally ripped this move a new one, may give him a chance.
But it won't come with a long leash, that's for sure.
Just when it seemed that Browns fans were accepting Chud's hiring (especially in light of some of the other NFL coaching hires in his wake, including Chip Kelly's wishy-washy flip-flop maneuver to take over the Eagles), especially considering the hiring of Norv Turner as his offensive coordinator and Ray Horton, who interviewed for the Browns head coaching job before Chud, as his defensive coordinator, that Brown and Orange balloon loudly burst with a pinprick named Lombardi.
CBS play-by-play voice Jim Nantz came on a Cleveland radio station the day of Lombardi's hiring defending it, while also ripping several members of the Cleveland media for having "personal vendettas" against him. Tony Grossi, who has been accused of personal vendettas many times during his long career covering the Browns here, and Bud Shaw were the two main culprits.
Nantz is also a friend of both Lombardi and Patriots head coach Bill Belichick (and wasn't shy about admitting that fact several times during the interview), so his take can be skewered as well.
While Banner admits to going out on a limb, Haslam proclaims that he talked to numerous NFL owners who told him, "if you have the chance to hire Lombardi, don't hesitate to pounce." I can only imagine those guys were holding back snickers and guffawing after hanging up the phone with Haslam if that was the case.
If all those owners were really sold on Lombardi, than why was he a TV network shill for the last five years? Why didn't all of those other owners bring him in if he was such a "slam-dunk personnel hire?"
If he and Belichick were so closely connected at the hip, why did Belichick never hire Lombardi officially with New England? He certainly had several chances to do so, and if he did, the Boston media and fans that still call him a "genius" for winning three Super Bowls in four years (albeit with the help of some illegal videotaping, but so be it) would have accepted it.
Bill Belichick could take a dump in the middle of Downtown Boston, and it would be lauded as a great thing.
But yet, Belichick kept Lombardi at arms length during his lengthy coaching career in New England, only using him as an unofficial consultant. He did hire his son, Mick, in his scouting department, but that's not the same as hiring the man himself.
Everywhere Lombardi has gone where he's stayed for a while has been a failure. Especially his time in Cleveland during the early 1990s.
I don't need to rehash all the gory details.
Perhaps Banner, realizing that the Cleveland media and fanbase were turning on him, decided to deflect some of that criticism by bringing in the main pariah, Lombardi, to take some of the heat on him. Sure, he'll still be zinged as the guy who ultimately made the call to hire Lombardi (no one believes Haslam hired him). However, if things go south, Lombardi is the ready-made fall guy.
Perhaps they brought him in knowing that they need to win and win now. Banner proclaimed there was no such thing as a "five-year plan" under him, and with this hire, that is certainly the case. Anything less than a 7-9 season will definitely turn up the heat on Banner and Lombardi.
Perhaps Lombardi gives Chud a free pass. Suddenly, folks aren't complaining that much about Chud and his "inexperience." Now, if Chud struggles, the media and fans will blame Lombardi's personnel decisions.
Lombardi is the Hyde to Chud's Jeckyl. That may be how Haslam wants it.
In the past, the coach (Pat Shurmur) got lambasted while the GM (Heckert) was lauded. In the beginning, Phil Savage was lauded while Romeo Crennel was lambasted (that quickly turned into both being lambasted on their way out the door). In Haslam and Banner's mind, why not bring in the GM that the media and fans already dislike to take the heat off their hand-picked young rising star of a coach?
Unfortunately for Belichick, it didn't work that way during his time in Cleveland. The fans and media turned on him when it became apparent that he influenced the Dead Judas to squeeze Ernie Accorsi out the door and give Lombardi more front office responsibilities, essentially taking Accorsi's job. When it came out that Lombardi was the impetus behind Bernie Kosar's benching and subsequent release, the media and fans ripped him apart. Both men were pariahs during that final 1995 season as the team slumped from 11-5 while the franchise was in an upheaval to Baltimore.
Lombardi needs to strike gold with EVERYTHING that he does in order to keep the sharks at bay. Never has a person been hired to Cleveland who is under immense pressure to succeed from Day 1 as Lombardi is, and most of it is self-imposed.
Lombardi wasn't shy in ripping the Browns organization from his media perch after his departure. Recently, he shredded Heckert's draft, saying the drafting of Brandon Weeden was a "panicked disaster," saying that Mitchell Schwartz and John Hughes were "substantial reaches," saying that they gave up too much to move up to get Trent Richardson and then ripping them for "throwing away" a second round pick on Josh Gordon in the supplemental draft.
Now, Lombardi takes over a team where his starting quarterback is the panicked disaster, the "reaches" are his starting right tackle and key defensive line depth, his starting tailback is the guy they should have never moved up to get and his best wide receiver is the guy they "threw away" a pick on. Gordon Tweeted out, "Uh-oh, am I in trouble?" upon hearing Lombardi was hired, which shows these guys watched the NFL Network and read up on this guy.
Good luck with that, Mike.
It amazes me that an ownership group that oozed positive PR upon their debut has done such an opposite thing, especially since the media and fans were not shy about letting their feelings on Lombardi be known when it was rumored back in October that he'd be coming in. Cleveland fans have long memories.
Who knows, perhaps there is a method to their madness.
If you think about it, most every regime change was lauded by the media and fanbase. Butch Davis? Fans loved it. Phil Savage? Fans loved it. Eric Mangini? Fans (at first) loved it. Mike Holmgren? Fans loved it. All of those hires failed.
Maybe the fans hate is a good thing. Maybe the opposite reaction will get the desired action. Who knows.
Lombardi has quickly taken Chris Antonetti and Mark Sharpiro's role away as most hated Cleveland sports executive, and he hasn't even made an official move yet. That's saying something.
The Browns put themselves square in the bulls-eye with this hiring. The honeymoon is over for Jimmy Haslam. Fans are threatening to cancel their season ticket orders as a result. They are now under pressure to win and to do well. Anything less, and the short leash will be snapped back on Lombardi.
As a lifelong Browns fan who is optimistic that they will reach (and win) a Super Bowl or two during my lifetime, I can only hope they know what they are doing. As a fanbase, we can only trust Haslam and Banner that they are not the same-old, same-old when it comes to Cleveland sports owners and there is a method to their madness.
Until next time, remember that Cleveland Rocks!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)